In the ever-evolving world of AI, two large language models (LLMs) stand out for their potential in marketing tasks: Gemini (formerly known as Google Bard) and ChatGPT. This blog post dives into a comparative analysis of these models, assessing their strengths and applications in marketing.
The WOAH Method
To effectively prompt LLMs, the author introduces the WOAH method, a structured framework for creating impactful prompts:
- Who: Describe yourself and your business.
- Outcome: Specify the desired outcome from the LLM.
- Amazing How (Optional): Provide guidelines for the LLM's response style, including creativity or tone.
Prompting Gemini and ChatGPT
Applying the WOAH method, the author creates prompts for both Gemini and ChatGPT using the following scenario:
- Who: They run a remote executive assistant agency.
- Outcome: They want to develop a marketing strategy with high social media engagement and a call to action for their scorecard, used to assess if someone is ready for an assistant.
The outputs from both Gemini and ChatGPT are then analyzed. Here are the key takeaways:
Gemini:
- Suggests initial marketing activities based on the prompt.
- Provides a more in-depth client profile when asked.
- Offers additional tips at the end of responses.
- Lacks clear formatting in content creation suggestions.
ChatGPT:
- Dives deeper into specific platforms mentioned in the prompt.
- Offers a clearer breakdown of content for different platforms.
- Lacks additional tips compared to Gemini.
Testing Other Marketing Tasks
The author explores using Gemini and ChatGPT for various marketing tasks:
- Creating Ideal Client Profile: Gemini provides a more detailed profile, while ChatGPT offers a solid starting point.
- Planning Out Content: Gemini is helpful for content strategy, while ChatGPT excels at dividing content by platform.
- Creating Content Copy: ChatGPT provides draft content with platform-specific examples, whereas Gemini offers headlines and body copy.
It's noted that neither response should be used directly for marketing materials; both require personalization and editing for optimal results.
Additional Considerations
- Repurposing Content: Both Gemini and ChatGPT can repurpose existing content for different platforms.
- Generating Responses to Questions: Gemini offers concise responses suitable for social media interactions, while ChatGPT provides more formal, email-like responses.
- Creating Email Templates: Gemini's responses are slightly less formal than ChatGPT's.
- Creating FAQ with Answers: ChatGPT provides both questions and answers, while Gemini offers only questions.
- Creating Documentation on Processes: While Gemini's output might require further organization, ChatGPT's format might be more readily usable.
Conclusion
Specific prompts and context are crucial for effective LLM use. Both Gemini and ChatGPT are valuable marketing tools, each with its unique strengths: Gemini excels in detailed responses and additional tips, while ChatGPT offers platform-specific content breakdowns and draft creation. The choice depends on individual needs and preferences.
Scale Effortlessly, Get Your Free Remote EA Consultation here: 2xyou.scoreapp.com